Now more than ever is the time to be thinking of fresh ideas. With Christchurch EQ version 1.0 and version 2.0 being totally eclipsed by events in Japan (Tsunami 9.0), it’s clear that some fresh thinking is due in the battle for sustainable buildings. Gerry Brownlee put his best foot forward (or, in his mouth) when he called for action on Old Dungas, and advocated “knocking all the old buildings down”.
The NZ Herald recently had a vision or two, with Chris Barton describing one scenario:
“Imagine Christchurch returned to swamplands – its two rivers fanning out in a delta of streams and tributaries meandering down to the sea among lush vegetation. Dotted among this primeval garden teaming with birdlife are built-up islands – mounds in the marshes made from debris and sludge from the February 22 earthquake, compacted and engineered as solid, safe, unsinkable ground. Connected by causeways, the islands are self contained, powered by sustainable energy and populated by high density mixed-use pavilion towers comprising apartments, offices, shops and other amenities.
Architects, the visionaries of our society, always have dreams. This is just one of the more extreme ideas swirling around architectural schools for the rebuilding of Christchurch. Radical and challenging, it’s an idea everyone knows will never see the light of day. But it encapsulates many of the issues the city now faces – how to defy liquefaction and how to live on unstable ground.”
So, sadly, the idea gets shot down without having ever been properly aired – but in truth the vision is a step in the right direction. Who really needs or wants to rebuild Christchurch in its present tragic form on its present tragic soil? Who would ever want to go back to Sendai and attempt to build again on those tragic, death-strewn wastelands? What is needed is some fresh thinking – and an extended version of Christchurch as Venice upon Avon may be just the measure to tinker with.
One of the biggest problems to deal with is the issue of churches. Out-dated buildings belonging to increasingly outdated congregations, despite apparently abundant growth with some church forms, the older forms – where congregations sat to listen to the Bishop of Fendalton, are simply dying away. While their building types may be looked upon as the flower of the very soil of Canterbury itself, in truth the Anglican and Catholic churches will be disinclined to spend their insurance dollars on reconstructing mighty stone edifices when a smaller, warmer, and friendlier wooden shack will do.
Some have put forward proposals already for the resolving of triumphant towers that would not sit still, with local piscine factions putting forward a rude and crude proposal for the Chalice and the Cathedral. What if we were to tackle the issue of Churches head on, and the removal of all that harmful and unstable brick and stone forever? The Knox church could be re-imaged as a modern, safe, timber building – with a fine heritage timber gothic roof structure, and no risk of collapsing brick walls? A new use could be found – perhaps as a meeting place, or market place, bulging with fresh produce rather than tired old vegetables?
Leave a Reply